Selection and reasoning

Work in progress:Workshop in Lyon

Unifying reasoning and search

Interleaving reasoning and selection

[WP2, WP4 and WP7a] Unifying Search and Reasoning Based on User Interests, work by WICI, ?OntoText, and Astrazeneca.

Here are some typical tasks which need interleaving reasoning and selection to solve the scalability:

(T1) Concept Classification with Consistent Ontologies: To check whether or not a concept C1 is a subConcept of C2 when the ontologies are consistent.

(T2) Concept Classification with Inconsistent Ontologies: To check whether or not a concept C1 is a subConcept of C2 when the ontologies are inconsistent.

(T3) Concept Classification with Dynamic Ontologies: To check whether or not a concept C11 is a subconcept of C2 by partially reusing the previous reasoning results after the ontologies are changed.

(T4) Concept Retrieval with Consistent ontologies: to return a set of super/sup-concepts of a given concept C when the ontologies are consistent.

(T5) Concept Retrieval with Inconsistent ontologies: to return a set of super/sup-concepts of a given concept C when the ontologies are inconsistent.

(T6) Concept Retrieval with Dynamice ontologies: to return a set of super/sup-concepts of a given concept C by partially reuse the previous reasoning results when the ontologies are changed.

(T7) Instance Checking with consistent ontologies: to check whether or not an individual a is an instance of a concept when the ontologies are consistent.

(T8) Instance Checking with inconsistent ontologies: to check whether or not an individual a is an instance of a concept when the ontologies are inconsistent.

(T9) Instance Checking with dynamic ontologies: to check whether or not an individual a is an instance of a concept by reusing partially the previous reasoning results after the ontologies are changed.

(10) Parent concept retrieval for individual with consistent ontologies: given an individual a, to return its parent concept C (i.e. no other subconcept C1 of C such that the individual a is the instance of the subconcept C1) when the ontologies are consistent.

(11) Parent concept retrieval for individual with inconsistent ontologies: given an individual a, to return its parent concept C (i.e. no other subconcept C1 of C such that the individual a is the instance of the subconcept C1) when the ontologies are inconsistent.

Notes from integration session in Berlin

LarkcProject/WP2/integration/reasoning (last edited 2011-01-26 12:54:00 by ?DanicaDamljanovic)